Well where to begin. That’s a conundrum. This was good. It was a good solid episode that worked well with many brilliant nods to the previous half a decade of Who. I went in with very low expectations and so I did enjoy it. But it was by no means amazing. This is of course what all of Who fandom has been waiting for all year: It is fifty years since the episode first aired on television and this ‘extravagansa’ shows the current Doctor teamed with his predecessor and a newly discovered earlier incarnation known as the War Doctor, who together must decide how to end the raging Time War between the Time Lords and the Daleks. And so, on with the review…
There were very many things I loved about The Day of the Doctor. First and possibly foremost, the opening. The original 1963 titles were a spectacular surprise, and the beautiful blending of the same first shot of a policeman into a colourful re-imagining of Coal Hill, with of course an excellent reference to Ian Chesterton as Head of Governers, and who better to be working there than Clara Oswald (Jenna Coleman) herself? After this, the opening was relatively mundane but that worked well; it was nice to have an opening to such a landmark episode without any Russell T Davies-esque explosions or dramatic music, to the extent that I had a great big grin over my face throughout the cinematic opening credits. In fact the same applies to the whole episode, it had a reasonably steady pace that wasn’t especially fast but worked well and allowed the episode not to confuse too much. This is clearly something writer Steven Moffat worked hard on, acknowledging the common criticism that his episodes are too complicated and so producing a good, intriguing and gripping but easily understandable storyline, making the whole thing very accessible for anyone.
Thankfully Moffat dives straight in with references to all of Who‘s history, with the Fourth Doctor (Tom Baker)’s scarf appearing mere minutes after Coal Hill school. This was followed by the Eleventh Doctor (Matt Smith)’s reference to his distaste of saluting, and of course mention of the Brigadier thanks to his daughter, Kate Stewart (Jemma Redgrave). Smith’s and Coleman’s interaction is also, as always, top notch as they’ve clearly grown closer over the intervening time we haven’t witnessed as an audience. I particularly liked Smith’s “I’ve had many faces, many lives” speech that was delivered with excellence.
On the subject of acting, I am slightly ashamed to say that I thought Billie Piper (The Moment) was excellent, and it was a relief that she wasn’t playing Rose Tyler in this episode, though it did seem bizarre that the Moment took her form in terms of plot. Joanna Page (Elisabeth I) was good, though perhaps a little annoying and over-the-top. Jenna Coleman was similarly brilliant and David Tennant (the Tenth Doctor) was of course very good, though there did seem to me to be something slightly off about his characterisation and I couldn’t help but guiltily wonder if really he might be slightly past it. All the same, his exchanges with Smith, both comic and intense, were possibly my highlight of the episode and really carried it on so well that the intervening U.N.I.T scenes seemed to be dull and long. On the other hand, the Time Lords (Peter de Jersey, Ken Bones, Philip Buck & Sophie Morgan-Price) seemed unfortunately rather robotic and wooden.
It did amuse me that for the 50th anniversary, Moffat has completely reversed everything Davies set in place, but nonetheless it was brilliant to finally experience the Time War but not to a great extent, as well as keeping the Daleks as a minor element (as of course they would have to be present to some extent in such an iconic event), and wasting no time in introducing them. Moffat generally got a good mix of comedy and drama blending well in his script, though it frustrates me how Sherlock-esque the Doctor is becoming, being able to see that the paintings were broken from the inside just from the shape of the shards etc. It would be a great shame if the two roles became virtually interchangeable in Moffat’s eyes. On the other hand, a big highlight was the blending of pieces of Murray Gold’s music from Davies’ era with each other as well as new ones, and as ever his score really added to the whole feel of the episode.
The brilliant lines and references to older Who just kept on coming and awakening the fan’s excitement in each of us. The famous “reverse the polarity [presumably of the neutron flow]”, Hurt’s “This has all the makings of your lucky day”, the mention of Captain Jack Harkness, the line, “He’s a madman”, the photographs of old companions, UNIT members and even Kamelion(!), the Doctors’ questioning of the “round things” in the T.A.R.D.I.S, the predictable reused line, “Oh, you’ve redecorated! I don’t like it.”, the use of a space-time telegraph, the Cyberman head (again, they had to be in there somewhere), the War Doctor telling the Tenth and Eleventh that his “future is in good hands”, as the First did the Fifth (Peter Davison) twenty-five years before, as well as the possible reference to Malcolm from Planet of the Dead, the War Doctor’s reluctance to adopt a catchphrase with his words, “For God’s sake, Gallifrey stands!”, his longing for “less conspicuous” ears and naturally the idea that he can regenerate just because his body is “wearing thin” as the First (William Hartnell) did. Unfortunately though the line, “I don’t want to go” seemed a step too far for me, appearing forced and unnecessary.
Yet no Doctor Who episode is without flaws: Did the War Doctor (John Hurt) really need to see windows to the future to see his future incarnations? Why was Clara miraculously allowed into the Undergallery with the Doctor without any questions being asked? How did the 10th Doctor immediately figure out who the Eleventh was, when before it has taken earlier incarnations so long to figure out? Why didn’t the Zygons in the gallery shapeshift rather than hide under sheets, especially since the shot where the false Kate does transform into her Zygon form looks so great? Why did The Moment look so longingly at the Tenth Doctor if it was only the physicality that was the same as Rose? Why aren’t space-time telegraphs used more often?
But these are small niggles. The main problem I had was the complete removal of the depth that had been added to the character of the Doctor throughout the last eight years, by which I mean his survivor’s guilt and the weight on his shoulders, as well as the idea of an evil side or incarnation of the Doctor, that had only been established in the previous episode, making the character far more intriguing, only to be completely scrapped in this episode. That, and the fact that it wasn’t quite as exciting and indeed commemorative as it could have been, meant that I was not exceedingly impressed with the episode, but it was still very good.
It did however make me very happy that show actually made fun of itself for one of the things that annoys me most about it, with the line “They’re scientific instruments, not water pistols!” Finally, acknowledgment that the sonic screwdriver is in fact just that and not a weapon or a magic wand! I also loved the little touch that the three Doctors drink tea together after the events are over, and that the museum interior looks remarkably like an old T.A.R.D.I.S interior, fitting for the fact that Tom Baker’s Curator character plays host to it. Speaking of whom, his appearance was a beautifully kept secret that was very exciting, but will admittedly present some great problems in the future for Doctor Who as he will presumably have to be noted as a future (as well as past) incarnation, despite probably being dead by the time a potential return to the show occurs. Nevertheless it was ideal that he was chosen to participate because, not only is he the oldest Doctor alive or arguably the most popular, but also because he had so adamantly abandoned the franchise until this year, making him the only Doctor never to return to the role on television until the fiftieth – how fitting! At the other end of the scale, it was a predictable shame that Christopher Eccleston was not involved, but one might think the BBC could find a more realistic look-alike for the powerful final shot.
Overall, the Zygons worked well despite being largely (but subtly) unnecessary, it was nice that the Tennant didn’t interact with Piper at all on screen, and the three main different time periods and settings blended surprisingly well without really jarring at all. I was glad that Amy and Rory Pond weren’t involved and thankfully thrilled by Tennant’s and Piper’s appearances, although I did think Hurt would struggle to keep the role of the Doctor for longer than one episode, struggling to find a comfortable compromise between adorable old man and fierce warrior. Nick Hurran’s direction is of course great, and the general (rather complex) philosophy explored was very thought-provoking. I am not perhaps as excited about the probable return of Gallifrey as some might be, but it is nice to have an altogether different story arc and I shall give Moffat a chance with it.
And finally a friendly reminder that next time the country sees any new Doctor Who, the Thirteenth Doctor, none other than Peter Capaldi, will be present. And I would be lying if I said I wasn’t looking forward to that!